Guide to Professional Development of
Out-of-School Science Activity Leaders

From the National Partnership for After School Science (NPASS)

NPASS

Providing Ongoing Support

If you expect to be working with a set of program leaders over an extended length of time, it is worth considering providing some opportunities for coaching and mentoring. Providing individual feedback to program leaders can be a very rewarding and effective method for ensuring successful implementation of out-of-school science programming.

The main idea behind coaching and mentoring is to foster a collaborative relationship with program leaders by helping them resolve issues and problems that come up when leading science activities with children. Some of this type of support can be provided during workshops.

Another way to deliver one-on-one assistance is to actually visit sites and observe program leaders while leading science activities. Some professional development programs have even involved the program leaders themselves in supporting other activity leaders in order to help build and sustain a community of learners.

Coaching and Mentoring

There are many different models for coaching and mentoring, particularly for those designed for supporting classroom teachers, and indeed there is no one method that will work in every situation. If you are new to this type of endeavor, we recommend using the version of observation and cognitive coaching described here. This type of coaching model includes three phases of intervention: (1) planning for an observation, (2) doing an observation and (3) conducting a reflective discussion.

PHASE 1: Planning for an Observation

Phase 1 involves meeting in advance with individual program leaders to set some expectations, discuss their progress with implementing the science activities, and find out the details of what they will be presenting when you observe.

Begin by explaining your role as a mentor during the site visit, emphasizing your willingness to collaborate to help make their presentations as effective as they can be. Make it clear that the purpose is not to evaluate or judge their performance but, rather, to collect information about how the children respond to the activities in order to provide helpful feedback and discuss presentation ideas.

It will also be important to schedule some time right after the observation to hold a reflective discussion about the session.

You’ll probably first want to ask some questions about the specific activity they will be presenting:

Checking in about their preparation (i.e., assembling the materials needed, reading the science background, thinking through the questions they will be asking) can help prompt leaders to anticipate any potential problems. You may offer suggestions for how to start the activity by accessing children’s prior knowledge about the topic. Negotiate your involvement in the activity, for instance, whether you will be actively assisting groups of children or observing from the back of the room.

You should also try to find out if there are particular areas where program leaders would like some support or advice regarding how to lead science activities with children. The kinds of things that often come up are

Some of these issues can be quickly answered in your planning session; however, if you will be directly observing program leaders while they present science activities to children, then it is best to address these issues in the context of the activity. Before you schedule an observation, decide together on one or two specific features to be the focus for the observation. Explain that you will concentrate on collecting information regarding those features in order to provide some constructive feedback.

PHASE 2: Doing an Observation

When making the observation, make sure to take notes on everything that transpires.

 

PHASE 3: Conducting a Reflective Discussion

After observing the program leader and children engaged in the science activity, find a quiet location where you can sit for a few minutes and discuss what happened.

Next move into a critical reflection about the session.

Again it is very important that you cite direct evidence from your observations and use non-judgmental language when making comments and suggestions. The following are some helpful stems for wording this line of inquiry: