image

Discovery Research K–12 (DR-K12) Program

Transforming STEM Education Through Research:
Making an Impact on Student and Teacher Learning

Location: Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, Washington, D.C.

Access the agenda, session descriptions, presentations, and proceedings below.

Download a printable version [pdf] of a DRAFT of the Full Agenda.

FULL AGENDA

Day 1, Wednesday, November 12

Day 2, Thursday, November 13

Day 3, Friday, November 14

Day 1, Wednesday, November 12

12:00–6:00 pm
Registration
1:00–2:00

Luncheon for Beginning Researchers/Developers, and Their PIs
Joan Ferrini-Mundy welcomed the beginning researchers and developers, along with the PIs who nominated them.
(By Invitation Only) Session proceedings

1:00–5:00

Poster Set-Up (for ’07 & ‘08 awardees only)

2:00–4:00

Nuts & Bolts Session (for new PIs)
NSF Program Directors John Bradley and James Dietz guided new PIs through the basic components and practical aspects of leading a DR-K12 project. Session PPT presentation 1 | Session PPT presentation 2 | Session PPT presentation 3 | Session proceedings

2:00–5:30

Rooms Available for PI-initiated Discussions
To support networking and informal conversations, participants were able to reserve a meeting room for anyone who wanted to participate in a discussion of a particular topic.

5:45–7:30

Working Dinner
Welcome from NSF and EDC                       
Presentation: Transforming STEM Education Through Research
Speaker: Joan Ferrini-Mundy, Division Director of DRL, NSF
Respondent: David Rose, DR-K12 PI and Professor, Harvard Graduate School of Education

The Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings is committed to the improvement of STEM teaching and learning through research that supports innovation and transformation. The National Science Board’s Task Force on Transformative Research encouraged NSF to solicit, identify, and fund innovative and “potentially transformative research.”  Ferrini-Mundy discussed the parameters and implications of transformative research as “research driven by ideas that have the potential to radically change our understanding of an important existing scientific or engineering concept or leading to the creation of a new paradigm or field of science or engineering.” She shared with the PIs how NSF is creating an environment to promote transformative research, and provided examples of transformative research from across the NSF as well as from the DRL portfolio. She helped PIs to see how they can make a case for a transformative research project. Bio and related resources | Session PPT presentationSession proceedings     
7:30–8:30

Poster Session (featuring posters from ’07 &’08 awardees only)
Informal Networking

8:30–9:00 Poster Clean-up

top

Day 2, Thursday, November 13

7:00–8:00 am

Registration
Informal Networking

8:00–9:00

Working Breakfast
An opportunity to meet with DR-K12 Program Officers

9:00–10:00

Presentation: Cyberlearning in the Classroom
Speaker: Marcia Linn, DR-K12 PI and Professor, Berkeley Graduate School of Education
The recent NSF report on Fostering Learning in the Networked World identifies new opportunities and challenges for education. Linn discussed relevant findings and suggested new directions for research, especially as they relate to her innovative work with cyberlearning. She has found that dynamic, interactive visualizations of scientific processes, such as graphing the impacts of global climate change; exploring the stages of mitosis; representing the movement in plate tectonics; and linking symbolic, graphical, and molecular representations of chemical reactions have had a significant impact on student learning in mathematics and science. Through a series of longitudinal and comparison studies with over 12,000 students, she has been able to show how and when cyberlearning can succeed, and her studies of over 100 participating teachers identify how teachers contribute to this success. Linn presented the results of these studies and discussed implications for designers of professional development and curriculum materials. Bio and related resources | Session PPT presentation
| Session proceedings

10:15–11:30

Concurrent Sessions
Transformative STEM Education Research: Student and Teacher Learning

 

Challenges and Approaches for Supporting the Work of Teacher Educators Through Materials Design: Kara Suzuka, University of Michigan

Working group. This session unpacked challenges of designing materials that support a range of teacher educators and began to work on approaches for addressing these challenges. Participants brang samples of work. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Communication in Science Inquiry Project (CISIP): Michael Lang, Maricopa Community Colleges; Dale Baker, Arizona State University

In this session, a scientific classroom discourse community was defined with illustrations about how to use the CISIP Instructional Palette to design signature lessons. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session handout 1 | Session handout 2 | Session handout 3 | Session proceedings
 

Discourse: An Effective Change Instrument: Rita Kabasakalian, Fordham University

This presentation described a research model and analyzed videos that demonstrate precisely how its elements work to bring change in teachers’ discourse strategies. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Helping K–12 Teachers Assess Student Learning: Lillian McDermott and Peter Shaffer, University of Washington

In this workshop, participants examined how to help teachers deepen their understanding of physics, recognize common student difficulties, identify effective instructional strategies, and use formative assessments to improve instruction. Full session description and related resources | Session proceedings
 

Industry-Education Partnerships: Research to Practice:Sandra Harpole, Mississippi State University

This session described how Industry-Education Partnerships builds successful partnerships between industry and education that bridge the gap between the classroom and the real world. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

An Investigation of Elementary Teachers’ Learning, Understanding, and Use of Research-based Knowledge About Students’ Mathematical Thinking: Michael Battista, Ohio State University

In this session, Battista described the difficulties that teachers have in understanding (a) elementary school students’ reasoning about length, and (b) research-based but teacher-friendly analyses of students’ reasoning about length. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

A Longitudinal Study of Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Synthesizing Research on Content, Pedagogy, and Practice: Valerie Otero and Steven Pollock, University of Colorado

Session participants reviewed findings on teachers’ content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and practice, which provided a context for discussing pedagogical content knowledge. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

PolarTREC: A Successful Model for Attaining Broad Educational Impacts with Interdisciplinary Polar Science: Janet Warburton and Kristin Timm, ARCUS

This presentation described how PolarTREC contributes to the discipline of STEM education and pedagogy through an innovative model of Teacher Research Experiences. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Project NEXUS, Year 3: Investigating an Afterschool Informal Science Education Internship for Diverse Upper Elementary/Middle School Teacher Education Majors: J. Randy McGinnis and Phyllis Katz, University of Maryland

An interactive poster session. In this session, McGinnis and Katz presented what they learned from placing 28 diverse upper elementary/middle school science-teacher-education majors in an afterschool informal science education program. Full session description | Session proceedings
 

Scaffolding Science and Science-Writing Instruction for Teachers and Students: Betsy Rupp Fulwiler, Seattle Public Schools
Respondents: Jeff Winokur and Karen Worth, Education Development Center, Inc.

Through student work and a new video of classroom instruction, this session examined the purposeful use of modeling and scaffolding that increases achievement in science and writing. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Videocases for Learning and Teaching Geometry: Promoting an Understanding of Similarity: Nanette Seago, WestEd; Mark Driscoll, Education Development Center, Inc.

This session provided an overview of the Learning and Teaching Geometry project, highlighting selected videocases that engage teachers in learning about similarity. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

VITAL: A Web-based Video Analysis System for Teaching University-level Courses in Early Childhood Mathematics Education: Frank Moretti and Herb Ginsberg, Columbia University

This session provided an overview of the VITAL project, which makes extensive use of video—online and in university classrooms—to help teachers better understand children’s mathematical thinking. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Worldviews of Exemplary African-American Teachers: Linda Coats, Mississippi State University

Linda Coats described the project Worldviews of Exemplary African-American Science Teachers (WEAST), a three-year study of exemplary African-American elementary science teachers. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Young Children Reinvent Newton’s Laws at the Practical Level: Rheta DeVries, University of Northern Iowa

Young children’s practical knowledge of Newton’s Laws of Motion was assessed in an interview involving marbles on ramps before and after a six-month classroom intervention. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session handout 1 | Session handout 2 | Session handout 3 | Session handout 4 | Session proceedings
11:30–12:00 pm Break
12:00–1:30

Working Luncheon
Presentation: DR-K12 Program and Project Evaluation: What PIs Need to Know
Speaker: James Dietz, Program Director, DRL, NSF
NSF increasingly faces external accountability demands and expectations that programs will use ongoing forms of data to manage and improve projects. These expectations require that the NSF evaluate programs as a whole (e.g., DRK-12).  In addition, PIs are required to evaluate their own projects and discuss plans for this within their proposals.  This session was designed to briefly summarize the expectations that the NSF has for projects to participate in a range of data and evaluation activities.
Bio and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings

1:45–3:00 Large-Group Presentations
 

Documenting Teacher Practices: Mary Kennedy, Michigan State University
What are the problems that face us when we want to document teaching practices in our research and in our program evaluations? During this session, Kennedy looked at alternative approaches to coding and capturing classroom events and weighed the strengths and weaknesses of each. Bio and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session handout 1 | Session handout 2
| Session proceedings

 

Measuring the Impact of STEM Education Programs: Challenges and Possibilities of Experimental Design: Adam Gamoran, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Bruce Herbert, Texas A&M University; Barry Fishman, University of Michigan; Leona Schauble, Vanderbilt University
Are randomized trials the “gold standard” for measuring impact? In this session, a study of elementary science provided the context for examining the challenges and possibilities of randomized trials.
Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings

 

Methodological Issues in an Urban Study: Okhee Lee and Randall Penfield, University of Miami
This session addressed challenges and opportunities in conducting research and development with elementary school teachers of diverse student groups, especially English language learners, in urban schools.
Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings

 

Media Panel
Panelists:
Maria Zacharias, Public Affairs Specialist, Office of Legislative & Public Affairs, National Science Foundation
Pamela Hines, Senior Editor, Science Magazine
Sean Cavanagh, Reporter, Education Week
Erin Uy, STEM Reporter, Education Daily
Members of the media who write and report about education research discussed the kind of stories that interest them; what readers need to understand about education research; and how coverage of this topic has changed over the years. This was an interactive session where panelists responded to researchers’ questions and concerns.
Bios | Session proceedings

3:15–4:30

Concurrent Sessions
Transformative STEM Education Research: Design and Methodology

 

Addressing the Challenges of Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: Jeanne Rose Century, University of Chicago

Working group. Participants in this session learned about and provided input on a suite of instruments and a User’s Guide for measuring fidelity of implementation of instructional materials and other reforms. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Challenges of Conducting Research in the Real World: Janet Carlson, BSCS; Julie Gess-Newsome, Northern Arizona University

Working group. Session participants engaged in a lively discussion of the challenges of conducting quality research using a school-based study and preliminary results for context. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Documenting Teacher Actions During Inquiry-based Instruction with the Analysis of Inquiry Rubric: April Adams, Northeastern State University

Working group. While viewing a video of inquiry-based instruction, participants used the newly refined Analysis of Inquiry Rubric (AIR) to document teacher actions that facilitate inquiry. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Documenting Teacher Practices: Continued Discussion: Mary Kennedy, Michigan State University

Participants in this session had the opportunity to continue the discussion about documenting teacher practices. Bio and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session handout 1 | Session handout 2 | Session proceedings
 

High School Mathematics Curricula and College Level Mathematics Performance: Thomas Post, University of Minnesota and Michael Harwell, University of Minnesota

Collaborative presentation. This session provided evidence for the effectiveness on NSF-funded and other high school mathematics curricula in preparing students for college mathematics. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Math Panel: Russell Gersten, Instructional Research Group

Following the release of the final report of the National Mathematics Panel, participants had the opportunity to discuss issues and implications of the panel’s recommendations. Full session description | Session PPT Presentation | Session proceedings
 

Methodological Issues of Data Collection, Management, and Representation in a Complex Policy Research Project: Carol Stuessy and Toni Ivey, Texas A&M University

This session described data management strategies using a “backward design” to focus the design of a policy research study, including data collection, representation, archiving and analysis. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Open-access Publishing: A Story of Putting Research in the Hands of Teachers: Julie Luft, Arizona State University

In this session, Luft described why we need to consider open-access publishing and shared her own experience as it pertains to her NSF project. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session handout | Session proceedings
 

Putting Pieces Together: A View of Learning to Teach Elementary Science: Betty Young, University of Rhode Island

This session provided an overview of the CAREERS project, which investigates attitudes/beliefs, knowledge, and teaching practice of elementary pre-service teachers and their cooperating teachers (background, readiness, content/process knowledge, efficacy, questioning, & videotaped lessons). Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Relating Teacher Value-added Estimates to Videotapes of Classroom Practice: An Exploration of Sampling and Design Issues: Nicole Kersting, LessonLab Research Institute

Using the Assessing Instructional Quality in Mathematics project as an interesting example, this session explored issues relevant to sample selection and study design. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

SUMA: Transforming STEM Teaching and Learning Using a District-based Building Capacity Model: Cathy Kinzer, New Mexico State University

This session provided opportunities to explore the design-based research, data, tools and methodologies of Scaling Up Mathematics Achievement, a research project studying a school district as a learning organization. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Using Video Analysis to Develop Shared “Words-to-Images” Language for Describing Science Teaching: Kathy Roth, LessonLab Research Institute

The Tying Words to Images of Science Teaching project engages researchers in developing shared “words-to-images” language for describing science teaching. Participants experienced this process by watching science teaching videos, working toward analytic consensus, and discussing its value and pitfalls. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session handout 1 | Session handout 2 | Session proceedings
 

Using Web Metrics to Analyze the Use and Impact of Education Digital Libraries: Kimberly Lightle, Ohio State University

This session focused on the limitations and possibilities in using Web metrics to analyze and evaluate education digital library use and impact. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
4:30–5:15

Poster Set-up (for all projects awarded before ’07)
Beginning Researchers and Developers Group
Informal Networking (Meeting rooms were available by reservation)

5:15–7:00

Poster Session and Reception (Light refreshments were served)
Group 1 (5:15–6:00)
Group 2 (6:15–7:00)
(Poster time and location assignments were announced by email prior to the session.)

7:00–7:30 Poster Clean-up

top

Day 3, Friday, November 14

8:00–9:00 am

Working Breakfast
An opportunity to meet with DR-K12 Program Officers.

9:00–10:15

NSF Update, Future Directions, and Response to the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning
Speaker: Cora Marrett, Assistant Director, EHR, NSF

Note: Due to a change in Cora Marrett’s schedule, she was unable to attend the meeting. Arlene de Strulle presented in her place.

Fostering Learning in a Networked World
Speaker: Arlene De Strulle, Program Director, EHR, NSF

Session proceedings

10:30–11:45

Concurrent Sessions
Transformative STEM Education Research: Curriculum & Assessment

 

Along the Continuum: A Discussion of Standards and Expectations: Susan Jansen Varnum, Temple University; George DeBoer, American Association for the Advancement of Science

Working group. The facilitators of this session led a discussion on content knowledge, standards, and assessment through the continuum. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Bridging the Gap Between Physics and Mathematics Through PUM Curriculum: Eugenia Etkina, Rutgers University

Participants in this session learned how the theoretical framework based on cognitive apprenticeship and formative assessment informed the content and structure of the PUM (Physics Union Mathematics) curriculum. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session handout | Session proceedings
 

Challenges to Cross-Disciplinary Curriculum: Data Literacy and Divergent Process Standards: Karen Swan, Research Center for Educational Technology

This session explored challenges to cross-curricular design, focusing on the integration of disciplinary differences in process standards that address similar skills from very different perspectives. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session handout 1 | Session handout 2 | Session proceedings
 

Crafting Research Tools to Establish a Learning Progression on Measurement Knowledge: Jeff Barrett, Illinois State University

Participants in this session examined ways of validating a Learning Trajectory, illustrated by an LT for Measuring Length, and explored ways of identifying and checking growth points and struggles. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session handout | Session proceedings
 

Designed Curriculum in the Cyber-Age: Jackie Miller and Fred Gross, Education Development Center, Inc.

This session focused on the development and use of science and mathematics curricula delivered electronically. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Designing Coherent Middle School Science Curriculum to Promote Integrated Understandings of Core Ideas: Joe Krajcik, University of Michigan

Krajcik shared a development model for designing coherent curriculum materials, discussed evidence that students develop integrated understandings, and shared the challenges he has experienced. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

From Fractions to Rational Number Reasoning: Building Student-Centered Diagnostic Assessments: Jere Confrey and Alan Maloney, North Carolina State University

This session presented research on rational number reasoning, syntheses, and the construction of student-centered diagnostic assessments. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

How Is Our Learning Progressing?: David Carraher, TERC; Richard Lehrer, Vanderbilt University; Nancy Butler Songer, University of Michigan; Brian Reiser, Northwestern University

Collaborative presentation. In this session, members of DRK-12 Learning Progressions projects highlighted what they have learned over the past year from their work with students and teachers, focusing on unanticipated findings. Full session description | Session PPT presentation part 1 | part 2 | part 3 | part 4 | part 5 | Session proceedings
 

Pathway: Web-based Just-in-Time Delivery of Pedagogy for Teaching Physics: Dean Zollman, Kansas State University

Zollman presented the success and challenges of creating a Web-based system in which physics teachers can obtain help on pedagogical issues. Full session description | Session proceedings
 

Preparing Teachers to Become Leaders of Mathematics Professional Development*: Hilda Borko, Stanford University
In this session, Borko discussed the successes and challenges in the first year of preparing teachers to facilitate the Problem-Solving Cycle model of mathematics professional development.
Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings

*Please note that this session is not placed with the Student and Teacher Learning group due to the presenter’s schedule.
 

STEM Curriculum Development and Implementation: How Do Materials Written by Researchers and Classroom Teachers Compare: Deborah Herrington, Grand Valley State University

Working group. This session was designed for curriculum development and/or implementation projects. Participants collaboratively defined key elements for teachers’ successful implementation of standards-based STEM classroom materials. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

The Use of Formative Assessment in University-Level Mathematics Courses: Judith Stull, Temple University

This session compared two sections of a math course, one that used formative assessment (FA) and one that did not. Students in the FA section scored a grade higher than the nonFA students. The FA technique engaged students earlier in the course; nonFA students had to play catch up. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Using Animated Classroom Scenarios in Teacher Education: Pat Herbst, University of Michigan

Working group. In this session, participants experienced rich media representations of teaching, created by project ThEMaT, and discussed how to use them in teacher preparation. Full session description | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
 

Fieldwork as a Method of Instruction: Don Duggan-Haas, Paleontological Research Institution and its Museum of the Earth

Working group. In this session, Duggan-Haas provided an overview of fieldwork within the context of their projects. This was followed by a discussion focused on the characterization, implementation, and evaluation of effective fieldwork instruction. Full session description and related resources | Session PPT presentation | Session proceedings
11:45–12:30 pm Break
12:30–2:45

Working Luncheon (Regional seating groups)
Presentation: The Next Four Years: STEM Legislative Activity and Options
Speakers:
Della Cronin, Vice President, Legislative and Public Affairs, Washington Partners, LLC
Jodi Peterson, Co-Chair, STEM Education Coalition; Assistant Executive Director, Office of
Legislative and Public Affairs, National Science Teachers Association
Samuel M. Rankin III, Chair, Coalition for National Science Funding; Associate Executive Director, Head of Washington Division, American Mathematical Society
Jim Wilson, Staff Director, Research and Science Education Subcommittee, House Science and Technology Committee  
What is the present status of federal legislation and funding for STEM education research? How might that change as a result of the election? Wilson began this session by providing an overview of federal legislation, such as the America Competes Act, that supports STEM research, infrastructure, and programs. Then Brown and Peterson from the STEM Education Coalition and Rankin from the Coalition for National Science Funding updated participants on the coalitions’ work. They provided information on federal budgets, funding levels, and appropriations for STEM education and research. The panelists ended the session with a look to the future: what to pay attention to and how to get involved. Bios and related resources | Session proceedings

2:45–3:00 Evaluation and Adjourn

top

image